Newsletter

Selecteaza Domeniu:

SRT compared to QUIC

In this article we’ll investigate how SRT (Secure Reliable Transport) compares to QUIC (Quick UDP Internet Connections). We know that SRT is a protocol developed to deliver video over unreliable networks such as the Internet. It uses UDP, which is considered unreliable, as the transport protocol. However, it simulates TCP, which is a more reliable method of delivering video, by including several of TCP’s features.

 


 

QUIC, a new protocol from Google, also uses UDP and likewise includes features which assure more reliable delivery. Google claims QUIC is more efficient than TCP in many aspects. They also make it the default method of downloading videos from YouTube, a Google owned service, when you are using Google’s Chrome browser. However, a quick test of accessing YouTube with Microsoft Edge reveals that standard HTTP/TCP is used. A recent study reveal that QUIC by now accounts for more than 5% of all Internet traffic.

 

The objectives of QUIC include:

 

  • security equivalent to TLS/SSL
  • reduced latency
  • bandwidth estimation
  • quick session establishment
  • quick security association development

 

These features are very similar to SRT. SRT detects the available bandwidth and uses the amount needed to deliver the video at the selected rate required to play out. For example, if the video is to play at 4 Mb/sec, SRT will deliver the video at approximately 5 Mb/sec, adding some overhead for packet headers and control traffic. The rate of the delivery to the network is relatively uniform, not bursty.

 

 

As the figure clearly shows, QUIC is very bursty in nature. It sends bursts of packets spaced approximately 8 seconds apart for about one minute. Then, it sends similar bursts of packets at intervals of about 20 seconds. The first portion is likely intended to fill the player’s buffer. The second phase is probably at a level which will keep the buffer partly filled. Because the traffic is encrypted, it is impossible to determine the exact packet structure. However, it likely that mpeg transport is being used, since the packets are consistently 1392 bytes in length.

 

QUIC may be rather unfriendly when mixed with other traffic, especially if that traffic is TCP based. For example, if the path of the QUIC flow is shared with a standard FTP transfer, the QUIC bursts will make it difficult for the TCP algorithm, which is used by the file transfer, to adjust to the remaining available bandwidth. QUIC also is likely to cause the network buffers to overfill. This often leads to packets being dropped from TCP flows. This is a cause of retransmitted packets.

 

QUIC may be an effective protocol for Google browser to retrieve videos from YouTube. Despite this, there remains a significant amount of research and testing to be finished before it can be endorsed as a widely used video transport method.

 

Source: Phil Hippensteel on SER compared tu QUIC